Talk:Promo Pets/@comment-35279991-20181205200549/@comment-32197189-20181206084557

There's nothing wrong with old stock - but if it is in fact old stock (i.e. stuff that has been made before jazwares and aj cut ties - then mate, that doesn't prove in any way that the values of the pets should be lowered. And just because you think something should be worth what you think it is, doesn't mean that it should in fact be that.

In regards to the furry comment, let me rephrase it in a way that might not get your back up as much.

Furries are a rather well-known item in the game, and you'd expect people with half a knowledge of AJ rares/trading to know what they are. Now ofc some people would not, and still have that knowledge/know-how, but the general majority would. By not knowing this (not saying that it's bad), it would somehow imply less experience with trading. And that's ok. This does however mean that with less trading experience (and subsequent knowledge) that an argument from someone with this lacking would have less traction. Does that kind of make sense?

I could make this comparison. If a new jammer told you something that you knew to be wrong... for example: "My necklace is worth a headdress" - then you would automatically say they're wrong. If they told you one of their items that's in stores, but a bit less well known - maybe a lightshade hat? - was worth a headdress... you'd still be rather skeptical, but part of the reason you wouldn't believe them is because they had little-to-no trading experience. In the same way, if you indicated you didn't know what a furry was - something you'd associate with small amounts of trading experience - then I wouldn't believe you as much as someone who had known.

And you're not addressing the fact that as I said before, it does indeed look like you're attempting to change people's opinions/faith in promo pets to get them to go down.