Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-34177111-20190213050010/@comment-34834310-20190213220015

00grumpybunny00 wrote: Sponkerl wrote: 00grumpybunny00 wrote: Angrybritishman wrote: LBD22 wrote: Lillithebird isn't a bad person- she's actually really nice from what I've seen, and I feel bad for her because a lot of people seem to be upset at her. And I'm not saying that I want screenshots for proof that this person has done something wrong. But what if they haven't actually done anything wrong? I mean I know people (not just kids) can be extremely illogical sometimes, but would they seriously just gift them a bunch of really rare stuff when they saw them? Probably not. Even if they were staff from this wiki, why would that be a reason for people to send them rare stuff? I'm pretty sure the people that are staff here don't get that sort of thing. All I'm saying is, even if their intent was to appear to be staff from this wiki, I don't think there's cause for alarm. Yeah, lying to people that they're part of the wiki staff isn't good, but simply saying  'This person is not part of the wiki staff and does not have any relation to them' would have worked. I agree and I think that Lili just needed to word it differently and say a lot earlier that she will be ging proof for those who are skeptical That's what i was saying. lili is a very nice person. shes currently trying to find the screenshots from a few months ago about them trying to impersonate us, so if this could all hault for a bit thatd be quite awesome.

dont go out of your way to attack lili, because she didnt actually do anything wrong imo and just forwarded a message to you guys. im sure lili didnt mean it like that so like, u guys should chill for a bit. We are not attacking anyone they should not have said imposter without any proof in the first place. That's what we have been saying.

I am positive that Lili is a very very nice person. But you can not claim anything without proof.

It's like someone steals the new bike you just got and you lost the receipt somehow to prove it's yours. Then you confront this bike thief with no proof to back up your claim and just get everyone mad. And we get nowhere.

Unless you go by the NapoleonicCode which states "proven guilty intel innocent. Then you can cry wolf. Thank you, my lord. This is what we've been trying to get at, so please, dont come attack us with your supporters when we're just pointing out that uselessness of having this warning up. :l