Board Thread:Worth/Wiki Changes/@comment-33211935-20191003005305/@comment-32197189-20191004072941

the problem is that there's no cap to what the max value of a particular species of pet is worth, but there seems to be a minimum. that's why we only report minimum values.

I think it's interesting and important that the community understands that other features mean higher values, and that these values are increasing (as per your screenshots), however, the page isn't currently set up to determine features. if we start reporting on features, pets become fully quantitative as oppose to qualitative, so that's why we tend to not report every single feature, and how it affects value. furthermore, it's not possible to give an accurate reflection about each individual feature.

that said, this will help a lot in contributing to staff discussion and alteration to the nm phantom value.

I personally think it's at 2 good longs, and while 2 red longs does sound more accurate, for consistency-across-the-wiki's sake, we'd have to go and update every instance of "good long" to its specific colour, and for items like parties, that's a little more difficult to determine.