Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-30334635-20181111225832/@comment-37347715-20181112030306

Nala10000 wrote: Asre wrote: Nala10000 wrote: ExtraSpicyWolf wrote: Now that I've added my two cents, which seems like one of the most impressive comments here (yeah lmao I have an ego, but some of you opposers to points like mine impress me), anyways, I'll not stick around too much now, this Wiki is a passion project that is a dumpster fire. I'm consulting a variety of direct sources now, like trading videos. I advise you all to do the same. I sound so serious, like I'm in some zombie apocalypse or battle royale situation XD, but you cannot visually see the inner workings of this wiki, like you can observe recorded conversations in the game on YouTube. Recorded conversations are foundational to justice. You can see the mentality and the actual root for what-equals-what in a transaction. You don't have to speak to friends and have false info, or be 8 black longs worth. Ah, yes, I've found the loophole. You can conduct tests, be your own scientist, instead of going blindly by a controversial bit who can't possibly publish their studies (on rares, I'm speaking in comparison.) All in all, you have guarantee the trades these values are based off of are trustworthy, as peer-selected, but a few jammers naming everything's rarity? With just one system for doing so ever implemented? Just check the versatile range of websites, posts, and videos to then think for yourself. It makes you into a primary source, even without having to do ten million trades and get carpal tunnel! >:D 10/10 Nala. I don't know how to say this without being rude. But I regret the time I wasted to read through that. It's just one long tangent. If you're talking about the long paragraph, I didn't write it :l My bad. I'll change the name.