Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-34175971-20190813054353/@comment-34175971-20190819054741

WolfthePhantom wrote: I think this is discrimination, I know it's for a good cause but.... I used to have a HD and some solids before I got hacked, and now I only have like a decent long. There are a lot of people who arent that rare because their items were given away or stolen I try to be active in this wiki and discord, I know my rares, Ive been on AJ for 5-something years. I try to be a helpful and trustworthy member of this wiki. I did get warned once for advertising, but that was because I assumed it would be okay because I saw another advertising post, I know I should have known better, and I'm sorry for that I've been inactive for about a month because of vacation and a lot of other things. But I'm back now, and I promise to be active in, or at least visit this wiki whenever I can. I want to be a staff member to help this beloved page grow. Sorry for bothering you with this long paragraph. I personally think the rarity limit should be fixed, or at least lowered. I think you should have a better way to judge experiance, since many of us have probably been scammed or hacked of oir items, and even if we have lots of experiance it woild take a long time to build rarity and respect. What if the new staff members got their 10 solids from hacking or scamming? Would you want that? I have frecuently used this wiki and loved it, even before I created an account and started participating is discussions. I do not mean to criticize or challenge you, but pleade consider my words. Thank you. Again, if you read what was written in the post and also the numerous comments. Would you want someone worth 2 den betas editing HD pages to what they think the worth should be, or someone who has that HD and knows what the worth is. It is not discrimination, it's purely so we can update pages quicker. There are 2 roles where the rarity requirement isn't included. One of which still helps moderate the Wiki.