Board Thread:Animal Jam Talk/@comment-35864911-20180620042104/@comment-32897848-20180624124452

Lolyallbandwagon wrote: Thank you for providing a arguement, I would write more, but I think you have seen my point well enough! Things are too over-hyped and not in fact "rare". I did in fact know what the worth of frog wall are was. Which is why I never even gave people the opprotunity to actually trade what I was asking. You can tell I put no information about my username or anything. I was never going to accept that trade, and wanted to see the reactions I would get. I wanted to see if people would believe what I was saying, or if they would get angry. I hate scammers, and I think the rarity sytem is a scam, it would be hypocritical for me to scam. I was not being dishonest, as I told my true intentions after, and never disclosed any information, I would use another word. Called a social experiment which usually happens in the steps I did. Other than that, you weren't rude, and I enjoyed reading your arguement. No problem, I enjoyed it. I would advise you to add "Which is why I never even gave people the opprotunity to actually trade what I was asking." as a disclamer at the end. So others know that this was by no means to look like a scam. Sense you've given me a bit more information,  and weren't actually accepting the trades I wouldn't call it a scam. "I wanted to see if people would believe what I was saying, or if they would get angry." personally I'm curious, how many people (If you kept a tally,) got angry or belived it? "I hate scammers, and I think the rarity sytem is a scam, it would be hypocritical for me to scam." from your stand point, I can see why you think it's a scam the item isn't actually "rare" sense theres still other ways to actually gain them other then trading someone for something like a "Rare" Spiked Collar. ". I was not being dishonest, as I told my true intentions after, and never disclosed any information, I would use another word. Called a social experiment which usually happens in the steps I did." (If all information is true) I would aswell call it a social experiment because thats just what it is. You tested random players to see wether or not they would get angry or beileve in what you said. While I do think it's more about supply and demand, or as you called it highly-in-demand and not all about the abundance or the scarcity /common vs rarity (I do think it still plays a key roll, [EX. 1st Glitched Ring.])

(It was no need to be rude for, from what I see its understandable at the least. No one has really questioned the "rarity" system, from what I've seen. I am still on edge with the rarity sytem being a scam, but as I said get where your coming from.) I completely enjoyed having an argument with someone who has questioned something that doesn't seemed to be a lot questioned.